|
|
Post by Philip on Jan 10, 2005 13:09:53 GMT -5
What is Phased-Iron Page 84 of Deus Encarmine?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sojourner on Jan 10, 2005 13:23:09 GMT -5
Who knows. I'm not aware if the term in modern physics, and it suggests something to do with the vibration of iron atoms in a solid.
Don't use it in any extended text, in any case. It is for all intents and purposes, garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Destecado on Jan 10, 2005 18:11:35 GMT -5
It all depends the context in which Phased-Iron was being used. It would help if you could post the rest of the sentence. If it is meant in the context that I think it is, then it may be refering to a composite material or a particular arrangement of a given material.
In terms of materials science and engineering, "phase" usually refers to the particular arrangement of atoms in a material. Example: the atoms in a piece of iron can form different arrangements, depending on its temperature, purity and how it is worked.
It can also refer to a composite material. Example: a fiber reinforced piece of plastic could be called a two-phase or two-component material, one "phase" is the fibers, and the other "phase" is the plastic into which the fibers are embedded.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kage2020 on Jan 10, 2005 23:57:27 GMT -5
Or it can even be a reference to a Phase Field Generation in operation on iron... A reference to the equivalent of bonded superdense armour, etc. As everyone else says, more information please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip on Jan 11, 2005 12:33:34 GMT -5
It was a ‘phased-iron padlock’.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kage2020 on Jan 11, 2005 22:23:58 GMT -5
Now that is just too funny.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philip on Jan 12, 2005 15:35:53 GMT -5
Now that is just too funny. Yeh, but possible tie in to Phase Field Theory? |
|
|
|
Post by Tynesh on Jan 12, 2005 16:34:52 GMT -5
Indeed an accurate point Phil... An ordinary padlock that has been phased out of this dimension so no one can pick it  Maybe it has to do with the structure of Iron atoms, could it be made any denser??? |
|
|
|
Post by Philip on Jan 12, 2005 16:42:51 GMT -5
Or maybe the actual structure down to the atomic level has changed and is locked (hmm) into a new pattern of energy. It’s iron, but it not as we know it.  |
|
